On 05/26/2015 06:03 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Hi Ryan!
On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 10:14 +1000, Ryan Lerch wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I saw it in the pending queue this morning.
>
> I just added a little bit to the front of the article to explain the
> issue a bit more.
Thanks - that certainly improves the post :)
> One thing that might be good to add to it would be maybe a link to
> the mailing list post / wiki article that explains the decision to
> not mass rebuild. That might be of use to our more curious readers.
> However, i couldnt find the mailing list post or wiki article (if it
> exists, i dont know :) )
I did find something, but I'm not too sure if it's worth including:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1349
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-22-No-Mass
-Rebuild
I think it's too much detail and will require us to explain the fesco
ticket and things. I think saying "there just wasn't time on the
schedule" is better, especially since the target audience here is the
end-user. What do you think?
> Moved it back to draft status for you to double check my changes --
> feel free to remove them if you want :)
>
> this post is probably good to be posted after the release
> announcement goes out too IMHO.
I've moved the post back to the review queue. Do we have a wp-scheduler
thing? You could just mark it to be published later, maybe a few hours
after the release, and forget about it :)
Awesome!
Yeah, good point to leave out the discussion -- if it was a simple
discussion, it might be ok to put it in, but it isnt a real easy one to
follow, so you are right -- best to leave it out.
I have done up a quick graphic for the featured image -- and have
scheduled the post to be published at 1400 today (US Eastern time) --
AFAICT the release is happening at 1000 US eastern time.
cheers, and thanks for the post!
--ryanlerch