On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 23:02 -0500, Patrick Barnes wrote:
We Want:
1. The Foundation to have full power over the name "Fedora" without
the threat of future legal issues
...
The Problems:
1. The Shadowman trademark presents a figure wearing a Fedora hat
2. The Fedora name is similar in meaning to Red Hat, and refers to
the type of hat worn by Shadowman
Okay, so you know where I'm coming from. That's good, thanx for being
the _first_person_ to actually respond to my concerns.
Why the Problems aren't Problems (and how):
1. If Red Hat transfers ownership of "Fedora" to the Foundation, it
cannot later revoke that right, meaning that we never have to worry
about threats to the name. Since the trademark is already established,
it will be difficult, if not impossible, to challenge successfully.
This is true from the perspective of any organization, not just Red Hat.
Agreed.
2. Any use of a hat in the logo would resemble the Shadowman
logo,
to which the Foundation will get no special rights. Due to the
relationship between the Foundation and Red Hat, it would be easy to
challenge any use of a hat. This is why we cannot use a hat in the logo.
3. From a legal standpoint, there is no relationship between the
word "Fedora" and hats. "Fedora" is just a name, and a hat is just
a
hat. Holding the Fedora trademark grants the Foundation no special
right to the usage of hats in images. Therefore, the name is irrelevant
with regards to allowing us to infringe upon the Shadowman trademark.
4. As a reverse point of (3), Red Hat cannot claim that the "Fedora"
name has anything to do with the appearance of a hat in their Shadowman
logo. They cannot say that the "Fedora" trademark infringes upon the
Shadowman trademark.
But what if another entity uses a name of a hat?
With the workings of the U.S. court system, the initial decisions
regarding what rights go where are likely to be upheld by courts in the
future. It will be hard for Red Hat to come back many years down the
road and claim that something they allow now should not have been
permitted. The reverse is also true.
It is unlikely that Red Hat saw this exact sequence of events coming.
I know, otherwise they might have considered not using the same name
from the University of Hawaii project. ;->
We can argue that Fedora should have been named something else in
the
future. It can easily be agreed that Fedora was probably not the best
choice of a name and that it does create some (minor) complications.
Okay, so you're seeing my points.
However, the name is now established and any shortcomings can be
overcome. It may seem silly that we cannot use a hat with a name like
Fedora, but it is the way things have fallen. There is no need to
change any names or existing trademarks. We simply need to choose a
logo that does not have a hat. With the popularity of alternative
ideas, there is no reason to complain about this.
If Red Hat(R) legal feels secure in its giving up control of the "Fedora
(TM)" trademark, but not worrying about another entity using a similar
hat name, illustration, etc... and using the "Fedora(TM)" as an
argument, I guess that's their viewpoint.
I just guess I feared otherwise. Not demonizing Red Hat at all, they'd
have to defend their trademark, and that might leave the Fedora
Foundation in a bad fix -- or, worse yet, seeing Red Hat not being able
to make its much needed argument to prevent someone from trashing their
name with something related to hats.
This thread is now gathering negative attention, so all who have the
best wishes at heart should discontinue this thread. Try to take
everything that has been discussed to heart, and understand that
everything is working out just fine as it is, and there is no need to be
concerned about future problems. Everything has been thoroughly thought
through, and all the little pieces are falling perfectly into place.
Thank you for being the first person who addressed this by finally
acknowledging what I was getting at. That's all I wanted. I will not
bring it up again.
And that includes not considering any hat for the Fedora mascot.
--
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith(a)ieee.org
http://thebs413.blogspot.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The best things in life are NOT free - which is why life is easiest if
you save all the bills until you can share them with the perfect woman