On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 11:20 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Which descriptions don't make sense either in the summary or after
> reading the specification. I think these are fairly good descriptions
> considering they are essentially developer specifications.
How about this as a compromise....
What if we leave the feature process development driven.. but we hook
in a way for someone who is perusing the feature summaries to easily
drop a comment or a note if they want a layperson explanation. The
notes would go to a marketing group..maybe even this list...an answer
is formulated and sent back to the person who asked the the
explanation and additionally linked in to the feature summary on the
feature list without disturbing the development oriented information
there.
This might even be useful in figuring out where the next developer
interview opportunities are.
+1 ... sort of like a press inquiries address, but offered as part of an
already useful document? That way we are asking for targeted questions
and not inviting wide-open requests that are mainly covered in the
features pages.
We could also find a way to cross-tie the SSS with specific features, so
one has a press-friendly approach and there is a reciprocating link to
find the deeper developer-oriented content.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu :
http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora :
http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41