On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 23:32 +0200, Max Spevack wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Jack Aboutboul wrote:
> For what its worth, IMHO we should go by regular, non-UTC fixed,
> because I wouldnt want to be at a meeting which was at 23:00.
We basically chose our 5pm eastern time meeting because that was when
Ian and Mo could make it to the meetings. At the time we chose it, that
meant 10pm in central europe. Now europe has moved ahead an hour, but
the 5pm eastern time problem remains.
So, the question is: is someone outside DST opposed to this idea?
If I don't get any answer before Sunday evening 20h UTC, we can move the
schedule for the next meeting.
Steven