Re: [Fwd: Re: RPM Article]
Marc Wiriadisastra wrote:
I received a very quick response from the original author and he is
quite correct at date of when the article was published. The
unfortunate thing is that he has not pointed that out in any future
articles.
I find that wierd that authors whether good or bad do not seem to point
out that it is not valid anymore and prefer to keep the bad in place for
an astronomicle (typo) amount of time.
Ladislav seema a pretty reasonable guy. Maybe he doesnt realise the
problems a old article like that presents. You can request that he add a
note specifically that its not valid anymore and is just being archived
there for historical reasons or take down the article itself. Feel free
to CC marketing on your mails in case he has any follow up responses
that he wishes to communicate to everyone here
regards
Rahul