"Official" communications
We're having a FF board meeting tomorrow. This topic -- "official
communications" -- will come up. Will keep you posted.
--g
---------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Foundation || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
---------------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:26 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >Am Montag, den 30.01.2006, 16:03 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> >>>>Developers have been
> >>>>communicating that this release cycle was only for FC5 for quite a
while
> >>>>now.
> >>>Yeah, and it seems that was not enough.
> >>Depends on where you get the information from. For example, distrowatch
> >>corrected its previous misconception recently.
> >>http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060123#1
> >That's not "official" -
> >
> What do you consider official?.
Me? If it is written somewhere on the fedora-webpages. A signed mail to
one of the mailinglists from a official person. A press-release.
But you should ask what is "official" for journalists or
wikipedia-writers.
> How do we communicate all the official
> information out there to make sure there isnt too many assumptions?
At least we *should clarify* wrong or unclear assumptions in the
community if they are floating around like this one.
How? Red Hat magazine? fedora.redhat.com? Wiki probably is not the best
place because I suspect some people don't trust the informations there.
--
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora(a)leemhuis.info>
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list