On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Duvelle Jones <duvelle.jones(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You know, I am not too sure about the reasoning to that decision.
But
that is something that should be up for discussion, there may or may not
be legal repercussion for the use of a non-open typeface. (and I am no
legal expert, so I am not sure to what those repercussion might be.)
Red Hat has paid for the use of the font in the logo, and can
distribute copies of the logo royalty-free. The only reason that
someone might need a copy of the font is to modify the logo, and per
the trademark guidelines, that should never occur, therefore there is
no legal ramification to distributing the logo as is.