Máirín Duffy wrote:
Duvelle Jones wrote:
> You know, I am not too sure about the reasoning to that decision. But
> that is something that should be up for discussion, there may or may not
> be legal repercussion for the use of a non-open typeface. (and I am no
> legal expert, so I am not sure to what those repercussion might be.)
There isn't. Fonts as a piece of software can have IP attached to them;
letterforms are not copyrightable AFAIK. So I do not believe there is
legal risk here.
IANAL, but I saw this source used as a reference when talking about this
issue:
http://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/20050425novalis
--
nicu ::
http://nicubunu.ro ::
http://nicubunu.blogspot.com
Cool Fedora wallpapers:
http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/
Open Clip Art Library:
http://www.openclipart.org
my Fedora stuff:
http://fedora.nicubunu.ro