On 27.10.2013 10:32, Nobrakal wrote:
Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of
case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have
any representant of the ambassador group.
I exaggerate, because some developers are ambassadors (like C.
Wickert, H. Guémar...), but they are in these groups primary for their
skills in programming. I don't say "they are bad ambassadors", but I
think developper task + ambassador reprensentant task are too much for
one person.
till this point i do not understand the intention of the e-mail
I think it's a great idea to strengthens the links between
ambassadors
and WG. The ambassador is an important link between users and
developpers, on my mind, he must be in these groups.
"must" is a strong word - we discussed concepts to enforce additional
group-memberships for Ambassadors as requirement in the past without
final results. Is this what you intent?
--
Joerg (kital) Simon
jsimon(a)fedoraproject.org
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JoergSimon
http://kitall.blogspot.com
Key Fingerprint:
3691 0989 2DCA 58A2 8D1F 2CAC C823 558E 5B5B 5688