On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 19:55 +0100, Clair wrote:
Ambassadors is (now) for events and lugs, and such. What's the
harm in talking
about other material during the meetings?
By that logic, having non-ambassador stuff on the ambassadors list also
> We seem to be spending as much time arbitrarily disciplining
> for `speaking out of turn`, as we are getting the work done.
The less people speak out of turn, the less chaotic it gets.
By that logic, the last meeting should have been very chaotic, as at
least 10 people were caught for speaking out of turn
People will eventually realise that speaking out of turn is
By that time, more ambassadors will have joined
but we also need
to educate those not in the know. This is something that needs to be made
clearer on the wiki, and also something that maybe mentors can assist with.
And I must say that is should be out highest priority
We must get everyone working on it, right away</sarcasm>
> I hate to say this, but I don't know if the current team of
> tchung as chair of the meeting is working out :(, no offense to either
> lx or thomas.
I think that Alex and Thomas are doing fine jobs.
> May I please volunteer EvilBob to perhaps lead the next meeting, if he
> is available?
I think it is perhaps not the best plan to have the person voted in to chair
to not chair.
Who said anything about voting?
And why not, in any case?