mailga added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Hi guys,
IMO this discussion has become a bit too long for its purpose. Let's try to not
running off-topic.
The question, as @bex pointed out is: Do we have any response time (also not written) for
Ambassadors when they are reached by mails?
Well, the answer is: no.
If we are seeking for reasons for not having established any precedent, there are many:
* we are not able to measure Ambassadors activity;
* we actually could check only FAS users by fedmsg (a script runs ad-hoc);
* Ambassadors activity could include speech activity that is not check due to its
nature;
* we would prefer having Ambassadors also if they're doing a little job;
* likely Ambassadors couldn't be comfortable to be asked for more engagement.
* Ambassadors could be busy due to their dayjob or even because they don't have the
willing;
* ..... maybe more .......
IMO when @rhea says that Ambassadors have some kind of responsability, he's right. If
we decide to discharge them from the responsability we simply say that we want everyone on
board. So it become unnecessary the mentorship, the polo and all the rest.
I know we want an easy access to the Project, but a sense of belonging is build with
little sacrifices. And I don't think that asking to reply to a mail is the same of
asking to kill themselves.
Being Ambassadors doesn't means only write four/five paragraph in their blog, or only
be present in some events; being Ambassadors means be part of the Project, also with
specific requests from the project.
We can solve this creating an Ambassador page (in the wiki or wherever) with all the list
of them and pushing out a request asking that each one will mark his availability to get
reached. This doesn't mean we kill the ones who won't edit their infos, but at
least we know on which one we can count on.
Thanks.
Gabri
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/famsco/issue/438