On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, inode0 wrote:
Perhaps we can address some of the more cosmetic suggestions made in
this thread as well. These are all very minor things. I can write up a
new proposed wiki page but I think making these changes is something
FAmSCo can approve or not for future elections without any big fuss.
This seems like a good idea to me. Let's get a proposal up, have some
conversation, and eventually come to something that FAMSCO can +1 but
that will be able to satisfy two sets of people:
(1) The people who don't have any issue with the current FAMSCO
elections -- we want to make sure that we don't create new problems.
(2) The people who have suggestions about how we can improve things --
we want to make sure that we are addressing concerns.
I also think that once we +1 something, we should also agree that we
won't revisit the issue for 2 elections, so that we can make the reforms
needed, and then move on to other things.
Thanks for your work, John.