On 03/15/2010 02:14 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 17:02 -0400, Max Spevack wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the things we noticed in the Marketing FAD is that Fedora doesn't
> have a standardized process for keeping the default bookmarks that we
> ship in fedora-bookmarks.rpm updated.
>
> I've taken the liberty of cleaning up the following page, which hadn't
> been touched in several releases:
>
>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Bookmarks
>
> I'd like to get the following issues sorted out:
>
> (1) The format in which the fedora-bookmarks package owner (Matthias)
> would like the bookmarks for any given release to be delivered. Is what
> I've done ok, or would you prefer something else?
I am the owner ? Surprise. I'd be very happy to give that up to someone
who has the bandwidth to keep this package up-to-date. If marketing
wants to play an active role there, feel free to take this over.
I don't think I have ever touched the package, really. In the past,
caillon was involved with bookmark stuff.
Yeah, I wonder how that got assigned to Matthias. Every other release
in pkgdb shows it as me, and I'm pretty sure I haven't ever tried
assigning it to anyone other than in marketing.
Max, is there a better person to maintain this? I'm okay with co-owing
and helping out the new maintainer, but I probably shouldn't be the
primary owner.
For the time being though, I can make the change if this is what
marketing's agreed on.
Let me know.
C