M Daniel R Magarzo wrote:
El lun, 08-10-2007 a las 00:18 +0530, Rahul Sundaram escribió:
> M Daniel R Magarzo wrote:
>> You're right. The main problem IMHO is that despite everything, nobody
>> knows very well what are the identity signs that Fedora should have, nor
>> the possible target audience it should be intended. But this is another
>> discussion that I won't to open here.
>
http://gregdek.livejournal.com/16940.html
That argument is not convincing at all. If you want to put yourself a
vendaje over your eyes.., your self...
What are you doing to help? Just waving a big flag doesn't change anything.
It's possible. One read so much info throughout the weeks..
It was just a comment I read.. You seem uncomfortable with it.
If sometime I find where it was, I promise that you will be the first I
will tell it.:-)
I am uncomfortable with people spreading misinformation, yes.
A strange colour for a skin, not? Maybe Fedora (=Teodora, Dorotea)
is
ill.
It's not a skin color. It is the color for a distribution. Very
different things.
Maybe like the freedom to use typical RH hats but in blue? What a
paradoxical!
It is part of a brand. Fedora's brand is explicitly different from
others. The name, logo and colors are part of it.
In relation with "consolidate your replies", please let me
know if there
is a only email that lacks of sense or not written seriously.
When you are replying to many mails, consolidate the replies. Dozens of
mails one after another as a answer for a week's worth of mails is not
very courteous to people reading those mails. Just common netiquette.
Rahul