On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 05:40:49PM -0500, charles profitt wrote:
Hello everyone,
I just finished a draft of an Article about the discussion concerning
the potential replacement of Shotwell in future versions of Fedora.
You will need to log in with your FAS account[1] before you can view
the article.
https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=11005&preview_id=11005&preview=true
I think I have covered the major points in the thread and the two
potential replacements that have been mentioned. I was not sure about
referencing a similar previous look at image viewers that was in Fedora
Magazine in 2014.
https://fedoramagazine.org/17-alternatives-to-your-default-image-viewer
-on-fedora/
This is potentially my first article for Fedora Magazine so I welcome
all feedback.
ref
---
[1] -
http://fedoramagazine.org/logging-into-fedora-magazine-with-fas/
I read this draft but I wasn't sure how this figured into our
publishing strategy for the coming weeks. Personally I think a story
that says "we don't know yet what the next photo app will be, or if
there'll be one" isn't very interesting for the audience. I don't
think it's helpful to direct thousands of readers to a conversation
where they don't have a lot of context.
It's more useful to me to have a newer look at image viewers than the
previous article. People already know they have choices, maybe a good
revision would be to show them updates there?
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com