Re: [Fedora-marketing-list] Re: Fedora in numbers, kde defaults in future Fedora releases
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
For me it's nearly the same way. I've started with kde but realized
shortly the gnome is the better one. for me kde is for the "kids"
Am Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:00:46 +0200
schrieb "Francesco Ugolini" <francesco.ugolini(a)fedoraproject.org>:
I've started my linux experience using kde but after few months
i
realize that gnome is the best window manager becuase it is faster
than kde and more acessibile and less *dos like.
2006/9/27, Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu>:
>
> Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
>
> > On 9/27/06, Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)math.unl.edu> wrote:
> >> You betcha! (:
> >>
> >> Personally, I'm of the mind to go KISS (keep it simple, stupid)
> >> and recommend going with kde default
> >> crystal(icon)/plastik(widgets).
> >
> > It depends simple for whom ?
>
> I'm speaking in the context of look-n-feel, icons/widgets.
>
> > I don't think our KDE is "Simple" with :
> > - long Kmenu (2 menus which basically say the same thing, (e.g
> > Administration and Settings)
>
> Administration -> system administration.
> Settings -> User-specific preferences
>
> Not really the same thing, imo.
>
> Besides, placement of apps in the menus is not a "KDE" thing, it's
> controlled by the apps themselves via what
> Categories=...
> are listed in their .desktop files.
>
> > - software confusion, 2 or more software which do the same thing
> > (e.g kwrite, kate, kedit)
>
> Not *exactly* the same thing. Each has different target audiences
> with different feature-sets.
>
> > It's hard, as an ambassador to convince people that you might use
> > KDE with fedora.
> > A screenshot of fedora's Kmenu is enough to frighten any newbie.
>
> Regardless, imo, this discussion is quickly moving off-topic for
> fedora-marketing. Followup on fedora-list.
>
> -- Rex
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFGt35Fs/JPNR65YARAgWWAKClXz0F0OKLiXFKT7CqvlK2fp85ZQCgrOOF
ONFPoJIFrX2aUYUzfyvOd+s=
=b7Nn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----