I think we should focus on the real problem. How is the Red Hat Community
Architecture team unable to co-operate with FAmSCo so that we need an other
group for that? Is it that serious?
Do we need a middleman group?
Apart from the fact that seperating into 2 groups that do the same thing is
bad, as Maria Leandro said, the non-Ambassador group that would help funding
events organized by non-Ambassadors, how could it be better than FAmSCo?
I think FAmSCo and the Ambassadors group is capable to manage all kinds of
events. If a packager wants to make an event, he should become an
Ambassador.
--
Konstantinos Antonakoglou
PGP key: 0xC9E2E16B
<anton.cost(a)gmail.com>
constanton @ freenode