On 03/15/2010 02:53 PM, Max Spevack wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Max Spevack wrote:
> I assume that from a package ownership point of view, this is
> virtually trivial? Is there *anything* difficult about integrating
> this package into the rest of Firefox & the distro, or is it really
> basically the easiest package in all of Fedora to own, and could be
> taken off of your hands entirely, thus freeing you of this
> every-now-and-then ping?
Here's an actual question:
When I took the fedora-bookmarks.html page and removed some stale ones
and added some new ones, I didn't worry about any of the metadata that
went with the bookmarks.
Compare:
<DT><A
HREF="http://fedoraproject.org/"
ADD_DATE="1158286779"
LAST_VISIT="1176675005" LAST_MODIFIED="1176675285"
LAST_CHARSET="UTF-8"
ID="rdf:#$c7+Ar2">Fedora Project</A>
<DD>Home of the Fedora Project.
Versus:
<DT><A
HREF="http://opensource.com/">OpenSource.com</A>
<DD>Open Source applied to the world.
How much does the metadata matter?
Man, good question. I think that it might be required per the actual
spec, but I don't know how much it matters in practice. Anyway, it's
pretty easy to do things the way I outlined in my last mail, so I
typically just do it that way which adds all the needed tags, though I
do have to manually strip out the ICON ones...