On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 08:32:50AM -0800, Christopher Aillon wrote:
On 01/18/2011 04:54 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:36:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:00:51 +0530
>> Rahul Sundaram<metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I would suggest:
>>> EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository
>>> and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds
>>> and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community
>>> project maintained and supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and
>>> mailing lists) as part of the Fedora Project and is not commercially
>>> supported by Red Hat.
>> Sounds good to me. :)
> Englishy wordsmithing:
> The collection of EPEL 6 packages is a complementary and compatible
> add-on repository for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds. It provides
> additional packages and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is
> a community project, maintained and supported by volunteers via
> Bugzilla and mailing lists. It is part of the Fedora Project and is
> not commercially supported by Red Hat.
We should use "supplementary" instead of "complementary". There's
subtle difference in the meanings: the former connotes that a thing is
additional to the whole, whereas the latter connotes that the whole is
not complete without the thing.
Just so -- tip of the fedora to you for catching that!
Also, "Red Hat, Inc."?
+0.5, at least.
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
- - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com