That was a joke with yacpi, please don't take my kidding seriously.
Sorry for the noise. :)
But xfpm needs really love. Maybe I have to rewrite sth. from scratch.
Best,
~R.
Am Tue, 13 May 2014 12:00:04 +0000
schrieb xfce-request(a)lists.fedoraproject.org:
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 21:12:47 +0200
From: Sven Lankes <sven(a)lank.es>
To: Raphael Groner <projects.rg(a)smart.ms>
Cc: xfce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Is xfce4-power-manager unmaintained?
Message-ID: <20140511191247.GD10909@killefiz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:31:10PM +0200, Raphael Groner wrote:
> since xfce4-power-manager seems to need some love from upstream
> since some months, the xfce maintainers in Fedora as well, and it
> seems to lack a persistent maintainer, I suggest to replace it in
> favor of yacpi, at least on the xfce spin media. Though, it's based
> on ncrus What do you think?
1st: the last yacpi release was 7 years ago
2nd: the it doesn't manage anything - it just displays the current
acpi cpu state and battery capacity. I don't use XFCE but judging
from the name I'd guess that xfce4-power-manager does more than that.
So I guess that the replacement is a bad idea.