That was a joke with yacpi, please don't take my kidding seriously.
Sorry for the noise. :)
But xfpm needs really love. Maybe I have to rewrite sth. from scratch.
Best, ~R.
Am Tue, 13 May 2014 12:00:04 +0000 schrieb xfce-request@lists.fedoraproject.org:
Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 21:12:47 +0200 From: Sven Lankes sven@lank.es To: Raphael Groner projects.rg@smart.ms Cc: xfce@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Is xfce4-power-manager unmaintained? Message-ID: 20140511191247.GD10909@killefiz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 04:31:10PM +0200, Raphael Groner wrote:
since xfce4-power-manager seems to need some love from upstream since some months, the xfce maintainers in Fedora as well, and it seems to lack a persistent maintainer, I suggest to replace it in favor of yacpi, at least on the xfce spin media. Though, it's based on ncrus What do you think?
1st: the last yacpi release was 7 years ago 2nd: the it doesn't manage anything - it just displays the current acpi cpu state and battery capacity. I don't use XFCE but judging from the name I'd guess that xfce4-power-manager does more than that.
So I guess that the replacement is a bad idea.