On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 12:09:20 +0100
Raphael Groner <raphgro(a)web.de> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I just wanted to sum up what's the possible solution so far for
> the end user. But you can do it obviously much shorter. :)
Yeah. We might want to make a note in release notes or have a wiki page
to point people to...
> I don't understand how the session is related to that issue in any
> case
>
> xfce4-power-manager uses a dbus interface to instruct the power
> management component. Is upower already merged to systemd, will it be
> in some future version (any plans to do that)?
I don't know off hand.
> KDE (and GNOME) have similiar issues. The main bug seems to be.
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859227
Yeah, I am seeing that same thing here with inhibit... ;(
> - and then for GNOME in particular:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=859224
>
> I tend to give up on that hibernate/suspend/sleep well/simulate death
> thingy when reading through all those comments. WTF external monitors
> need special handling? Cause it gets more and more complex. Yeah, it
> should be routed to the end user that can configure it fully like she
> wants. SCNR to do some trolling here.
Yeah, ideally users only need to configure things in
xfce4-power-manager and not change random config files and hunt
around. ;(
kevin
Xfce Power Manager handles the suspend for me (when in Xfce) and I have
no issues.
Do you guys have trouble with it?