1:55 a.m.
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 25/2009
Time: 2009-06-16 16:00 UTC
Meeting page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2009-06-16
Meeting log:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/c/c4/KDE-SIG-2009-06-16.txt
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Participants =
* Ben Boeckel
* JaroslavReznik
* KevinKofler
* LukasTinkl
* RexDieter
* StevenParrish
* ThanNgo
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Agenda =
topics to discuss:
* kde-4.2.90 status
o kdebindings-4.2.90 build failures for < f12
* OO.o KDE 4 integration [1]
recent bugs:
* Selinux/knotify issues [2] [3]
= Summary =
kde-4.2.90 status
* kdebindings-4.2.90 build failures for < f12
o builds OK with new PyQt4
o so we need patch for old PyQt4
+ rdieter already did it in 4.2.90-2
OO.o KDE 4 integration
* there is KDE 4 support for OO.o now
* we don't want to ship on Live CD but we want it (even after KO 2 are out)
* we have to check current state
o full integration would be NWF (native widget framework), dialogs and URL
handlers?
* dtardon (OO.o co-maintainer) will to help us
o jreznik is in contact with dtardon and take care about OO.o KDE 4
integration
o we need maintainer as OO.o guys are not interested in
o KDE 4 integration support will be packaged separately
* gvfs is not problem for us (depends only on glib2), but native kio support
would be better
== Recent bugs ==
Selinux/knotify issues
* probably 2 instances of the same bug
* Fedora or RPM Fusion packages bug?
* SELinux never tells us which shared object is actually at fault
o we have to contact dwalsh for help
+ already CC on bugs
+ Kevin_Kofler will ping him
= Links =
[1] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/ooo-build/2009-June/000036.html
[2] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/506126
[3] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/506122
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Next Meeting =
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2009-06-23
--
Jaroslav ŘeznÃk <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 731 455 332
Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/
7:37 a.m.
On Thursday 18 June 2009 08:55:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
OO.o KDE 4 integration
* there is KDE 4 support for OO.o now
* we don't want to ship on Live CD but we want it (even after KO 2 are out)
* we have to check current state
o full integration would be NWF (native widget framework), dialogs and
URL handlers?
* dtardon (OO.o co-maintainer) will to help us
Recent news from dtardon - it finally builds! It wasn't easy to apply the
patches, so thanks a lot David!
Jaroslav
o jreznik is in contact with dtardon and take care about OO.o KDE
4
integration
o we need maintainer as OO.o guys are not interested in
o KDE 4 integration support will be packaged separately
* gvfs is not problem for us (depends only on glib2), but native kio
support would be better
7:50 a.m.
So when will we see it? Drool drool slurp, hunger pangs :)
Eli
On Thursday 18 June 2009 15:37:38 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2009 08:55:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
> OO.o KDE 4 integration
> * there is KDE 4 support for OO.o now
> * we don't want to ship on Live CD but we want it (even after KO 2 are out)
> * we have to check current state
> o full integration would be NWF (native widget framework), dialogs and
> URL handlers?
> * dtardon (OO.o co-maintainer) will to help us
Recent news from dtardon - it finally builds! It wasn't easy to apply the
patches, so thanks a lot David!
Jaroslav
> o jreznik is in contact with dtardon and take care about OO.o KDE 4
> integration
> o we need maintainer as OO.o guys are not interested in
> o KDE 4 integration support will be packaged separately
> * gvfs is not problem for us (depends only on glib2), but native kio
> support would be better
_______________________________________________
fedora-kde mailing list
fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
8:08 a.m.
On Thursday 18 June 2009 14:50:29 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
So when will we see it? Drool drool slurp, hunger pangs :)
I've just met David in the toilet and he said that maybe tonight :-) But you
know - OO.o is big beast so...
Jaroslav
Eli
On Thursday 18 June 2009 15:37:38 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2009 08:55:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > OO.o KDE 4 integration
> > * there is KDE 4 support for OO.o now
> > * we don't want to ship on Live CD but we want it (even after KO 2 are
> > out) * we have to check current state
> > o full integration would be NWF (native widget framework), dialogs
> > and URL handlers?
> > * dtardon (OO.o co-maintainer) will to help us
>
> Recent news from dtardon - it finally builds! It wasn't easy to apply the
> patches, so thanks a lot David!
>
> Jaroslav
>
> > o jreznik is in contact with dtardon and take care about OO.o KDE 4
> > integration
> > o we need maintainer as OO.o guys are not interested in
> > o KDE 4 integration support will be packaged separately
> > * gvfs is not problem for us (depends only on glib2), but native kio
> > support would be better
>
> _______________________________________________
> fedora-kde mailing list
> fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
> New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
8:32 a.m.
On Thursday 18 June 2009 16:08:29 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2009 14:50:29 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> So when will we see it? Drool drool slurp, hunger pangs :)
I've just met David in the toilet and he said that maybe tonight :-) But you
know - OO.o is big beast so...
Jaroslav
>
K, You will let us know when and where?
Oh... Sometime next week I may ask your help with translatoid. We're way behind cause
I was hoping that the developer would find some easy way to accommodate us regarding
country flags, but I have not seen any movement in that direction. And of course its a
problem and so I will need some kind of patch.
But... that's a different issue
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
10:27 a.m.
On Thursday 18 June 2009 15:32:48 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2009 16:08:29 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2009 14:50:29 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > So when will we see it? Drool drool slurp, hunger pangs :)
>
> I've just met David in the toilet and he said that maybe tonight :-) But
> you know - OO.o is big beast so...
>
> Jaroslav
K, You will let us know when and where?
Oh... Sometime next week I may ask your help with translatoid. We're way
behind cause I was hoping that the developer would find some easy way to
accommodate us regarding country flags, but I have not seen any movement in
that direction. And of course its a problem and so I will need some kind of
patch.
There is new policy regarding flags, check it!
Jaroslav
But... that's a different issue
Eli
12:25 p.m.
On Thursday 18 June 2009 18:27:15 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2009 15:32:48 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Thursday 18 June 2009 16:08:29 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 June 2009 14:50:29 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > So when will we see it? Drool drool slurp, hunger pangs :)
> >
> > I've just met David in the toilet and he said that maybe tonight :-) But
> > you know - OO.o is big beast so...
> >
> > Jaroslav
>
> K, You will let us know when and where?
>
> Oh... Sometime next week I may ask your help with translatoid. We're way
> behind cause I was hoping that the developer would find some easy way to
> accommodate us regarding country flags, but I have not seen any movement in
> that direction. And of course its a problem and so I will need some kind of
> patch.
There is new policy regarding flags, check it!
Where will I find the new policy and I hope I am giving a premature yay :)
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
3:38 a.m.
New subject: Packaging Policy and Country Flags
> There is new policy regarding flags, check it!
>
Where will I find the new policy and I hope I am giving a premature yay :)
Jaroslav?
I've really tried to find where the policy is regarding packaging and country flags.
Could you please point me in the right direction
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
3:51 a.m.
New subject: Packaging Policy and Country Flags
On Friday 19 June 2009 10:38:11 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > There is new policy regarding flags, check it!
>
> Where will I find the new policy and I hope I am giving a premature yay
> :)
Jaroslav?
I've really tried to find where the policy is regarding packaging and
country flags. Could you please point me in the right direction
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Maintainers_Flags_Policy
But this policy is not in effect. I asked Dan Horak (our RH FESCo member) and
he said - flags are now allowed but the policy is still under review. I think
best way to handle flags is package them as noarch -flags subpackage.
Jaroslav
Eli
4:13 a.m.
New subject: Packaging Policy and Country Flags
So currently, there is no policy? Is my understanding correct?
Eli
On Friday 19 June 2009 11:51:33 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Friday 19 June 2009 10:38:11 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > There is new policy regarding flags, check it!
> >
> > Where will I find the new policy and I hope I am giving a premature yay
> > :)
>
> Jaroslav?
>
> I've really tried to find where the policy is regarding packaging and
> country flags. Could you please point me in the right direction
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Maintainers_Flags_Policy
But this policy is not in effect. I asked Dan Horak (our RH FESCo member) and
he said - flags are now allowed but the policy is still under review. I think
best way to handle flags is package them as noarch -flags subpackage.
Jaroslav
> Eli
_______________________________________________
fedora-kde mailing list
fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
1:24 a.m.
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
Oh... Sometime next week I may ask your help with translatoid.
We're way
behind cause I was hoping that the developer would find some easy way to
accommodate us regarding country flags, but I have not seen any movement
in that direction. And of course its a problem and so I will need some
kind of patch.
Just ship the flags. Right now there's no official policy against them, the
one which got passed got suspended until further notice and nothing
happened since that.
Kevin Kofler
1:41 a.m.
On Monday 22 June 2009 09:24:28 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> Oh... Sometime next week I may ask your help with translatoid. We're way
> behind cause I was hoping that the developer would find some easy way to
> accommodate us regarding country flags, but I have not seen any movement
> in that direction. And of course its a problem and so I will need some
> kind of patch.
Just ship the flags. Right now there's no official policy against them, the
one which got passed got suspended until further notice and nothing
happened since that.
Kevin Kofler
Very cool.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
3:19 a.m.
On Thursday 18 June 2009 15:08:29 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Thursday 18 June 2009 14:50:29 Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> So when will we see it? Drool drool slurp, hunger pangs :)
I've just met David in the toilet and he said that maybe tonight :-) But
you know - OO.o is big beast so...
Jaroslav
> Eli
>
> On Thursday 18 June 2009 15:37:38 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 June 2009 08:55:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > OO.o KDE 4 integration
> > > * there is KDE 4 support for OO.o now
> > > * we don't want to ship on Live CD but we want it (even after KO 2
> > > are out) * we have to check current state
> > > o full integration would be NWF (native widget framework), dialogs
> > > and URL handlers?
> > > * dtardon (OO.o co-maintainer) will to help us
> >
> > Recent news from dtardon - it finally builds! It wasn't easy to apply
> > the patches, so thanks a lot David!
Ha, it's working! I've just seen OO.o with native Qt widgets and file dialog.
David is preparing package. Even his patches are more enhanced than Novell's
ones :D
Jaroslav
> > Jaroslav
> >
> > > o jreznik is in contact with dtardon and take care about OO.o KDE 4
> > > integration
> > > o we need maintainer as OO.o guys are not interested in
> > > o KDE 4 integration support will be packaged separately
> > > * gvfs is not problem for us (depends only on glib2), but native kio
> > > support would be better
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > fedora-kde mailing list
> > fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
> > New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
_______________________________________________
fedora-kde mailing list
fedora-kde(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kde
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
3:36 a.m.
On Friday 19 June 2009 11:19:02 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Ha, it's working! I've just seen OO.o with native Qt widgets
and file dialog.
David is preparing package. Even his patches are more enhanced than Novell's
ones :D
Really looking forward to this.
Eli
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
5:12 a.m.
2009/6/19 Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Ha, it's working! I've just seen OO.o with native Qt widgets and file dialog.
David is preparing package. Even his patches are more enhanced than Novell's
ones :D
Jaroslav
Will they be pushed upstream? And, is it possible to get something
similar with firefox?
--
--Torstein
5422
days inactive
5426
days old
14 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Eli Wapniarski -
Jaroslav Reznik -
Kevin Kofler -
Torstein Adolf Winterseth