July 2018 - kde - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Gerald B. Cox

I find that I now cannot select themes - and I'm getting either a solid white or blue background when SDDM starts. When I tried to test, this is what I received: sddm-greeter --theme /usr/share/sddm/themes/01-fedora-breeze [11:43:09.032] (II) GREETER: High-DPI autoscaling not Enabled [11:43:09.108] (EE) GREETER: Socket error: "QLocalSocket::connectToServer: Invalid name" [11:43:09.109] (EE) GREETER: Cannot connect to the daemon - is it running? [11:43:09.317] (II) GREETER: Loading file:///usr/share/sddm/themes/01-fedora-breeze/Main.qml... [11:43:09.317] (WW) GREETER: file:///usr/share/sddm/themes/01-fedora-breeze/Main.qml: No such file or directory [11:43:09.317] (WW) GREETER: file:///usr/share/sddm/themes/01-fedora-breeze/Main.qml: No such file or directory [11:43:09.317] (WW) GREETER: Fallback to embedded theme Wanted to see if there was a quick fix or if this is known before I create a bug report. I didn't see anything on bugzilla, but might have missed it. Thanks!

1 month, 2 weeks

3
10
0 / 0

Amarok, Juk & Elisa

by Joe Buckley

I hope this is appropriate. I'm not a contributor, but I am a long-time KDE (Fedora) user who has an extensive music collection on my lap-top. Since I saw the discussion about dropping Amarok (because of the use of qt4???) I installed and tried to configure juk. My experience is - it's not quite ready for prime time. Once juk is given a directory it creates a "collection" (it's a surprisingly confusing term!). That collection cannot be changed (or at least, the way to change it is lost in the mists of antiquity). Apparently, "collection" is not "directory" or "folder". A folder, once created, cannot be removed without crashing juk. At least, I found a way to create a folder that crashes juk when any attempt to remove from juk is made. Playlists are displayed in no known order. It is certainly not alphabetical. Column order cannot be changed. Changes to the settings (like, removing the comment column) are not retained from session to session. I'm starting to hope that Amarok is kept in the live image. -- */~ Joe Buckley/*

5 months, 3 weeks

10
23
0 / 0

Kinoite, a KDE version of Fedora Silverblue

by Timothée Ravier

Hi! This is proof of concept to build a KDE based version of Fedora Silverblue. I called it Kinoite because it had to start with a 'K' and Kinoite is a blue mineral. The resulting desktop only has Firefox and Konsole as main applications installed by default (the minimum for easy Flatpak/Flathub usage). **This has only been tested inside a virtual machine for now, so use at your own risk!** Instructions to try it out on an already installed Fedora Silverblue system: curl -O https://tim.siosm.fr/downloads/siosm_gpg.pub sudo ostree remote add kinoite https://siosm.fr/kinoite/ --gpg-import siosm_gpg.pub sudo ostree admin pin 0 sudo rpm-ostree rebase kinoite:fedora/28/x86_64/kinoite Instructions to build your own: git clone https://pagure.io/fork/siosm/workstation-ostree-config sudo rpm-ostree compose tree --repo=ostree_repo --cachedir=ostree_cache workstation-ostree-config/kinoite.json The changes are available in the following repositories: https://pagure.io/fork/siosm/fedora-comps (master) https://pagure.io/fork/siosm/workstation-ostree-config (f28-kinoite branch) Unfortunately, the current configuration layout makes it hard to switch base packages without duplicating the entire config tree. Thus the Kinoite config is simply a copy of the Silverblue one and is not integrated at all. See also the discussion at: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/kinoite-a-kde-version-of-fedora-si... Hope you like it!

8 months, 2 weeks

3
4
0 / 0

Plasma 5.13

by Matthieu Gras

Upstream released Plasma 5.13.3. Are there any reasons why Plasma is still at 5.13.1 in Rawhide and not even in testing for F28?

9 months

6
10
0 / 0

Missing dependencies

by Matthieu Gras

Hi, it seems that there is a dependency for plasma-workspace which is missing (maybe only on plasma 5.13.3) namely: qqc2-desktop-style Not having this packages causes this bug: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi? id=396888 which is a duplicate of https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395097

9 months

2
1
0 / 0

Re: Again, please announce your so-name bumps!

by Adam Williamson

On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 09:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 08:19 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > please announce your so-name bumps *before* you push them. This time LibRaw > > bumped its version, as a result we have broken dependencies and some > > composes like Astronomy spin fail to build… > > > > Problem 1: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides libraw.so.16()(64bit) needed by siril-0.9.9-2.fc29.x86_64 > > Problem 2: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides libraw.so.16()(64bit) needed by > > kstars-1:2.9.6-2.fc29.x86_64 > > Problem 3: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides libraw.so.16()(64bit) needed by > > indi-gphoto-1.7.2-2.fc29.x86_64 > > Problem 4: conflicting requests > > - package gimp-2:2.10.4-1.fc29.1.x86_64 requires > > libgegl-0.4.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > - package gimp-2:2.10.4-1.fc29.1.x86_64 requires > > libgegl-npd-0.4.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > > installed > > - package gimp-2:2.10.4-1.fc29.1.x86_64 requires gegl04(x86-64) >= > > 0.4.4, but none of the providers can be installed > > - nothing provides libraw.so.16()(64bit) needed by gegl04-0.4.4-1.fc29.x86_64 > > > > I'm going to rebuild gimp, indi-gphoto, kstars and siril now. But I'm sure > > there are more broken dependencies. > > Here's the others: BTW, I suspect what may have happened here is the bump was inadvertently introduced by the mass rebuild. It looks like Gwyn committed the bump to 0.19 to dist-git on 2018-06-29 but (presumably intentionally) did not actually *build* it - there is no 0.19 build prior to the 0.19.0-2.fc29 that was done by the mass rebuild. So I think perhaps Gwyn was waiting to be ready to rebuild all the dependencies, but things got pre-empted by the mass rebuild :/ I'm working through the list now. So far it looks like kf5-libkdcraw and krita (which actually appears to have a bundled copy of the same library: https://github.com/KDE/krita/tree/master/plugins/impex/raw/3rdparty/libkd... ) need actual code changes to build with 0.19. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

9 months, 1 week

1
0
0 / 0

Missing dependencies for Plasma 5.13

by Gerald B. Cox

Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:38 ago on Mon 16 Jul 2018 10:22:48 PM PDT. Dependencies resolved. Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package plasma-desktop-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 2: package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.i686 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 3: package plasma-integration-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.i686 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package plasma-integration-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.i686 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 4: package plasma-lookandfeel-fedora-5.13.3-3.fc28.noarch requires plasma-workspace = 5.13.3-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.i686 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package plasma-lookandfeel-fedora-5.12.6-1.fc28.noarch - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.i686 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 5: package sddm-breeze-5.13.3-3.fc28.noarch requires plasma-workspace = 5.13.3-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.i686 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package sddm-breeze-5.12.6-1.fc28.noarch - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.i686 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 6: problem with installed package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 requires libkworkspace5(x86-64) = 5.12.6-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libkworkspace5-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 and libkworkspace5-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install both libkworkspace5-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 and libkworkspace5-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package libkworkspace5-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.i686 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 7: package kde-print-manager-17.12.3-1.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.6-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.i686 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.6-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.4-1.fc28.i686 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.4-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.4-1.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.4-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both plasma-workspace-common-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-common-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install both plasma-workspace-common-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-common-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install both plasma-workspace-common-5.12.4-1.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-common-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.i686 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package plasma-workspace-common-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package kde-print-manager-17.12.3-1.fc28.x86_64 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.i686 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 8: problem with installed package sddm-breeze-5.12.6-1.fc28.noarch - package sddm-breeze-5.12.6-1.fc28.noarch requires plasma-workspace = 5.12.6-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.i686 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.6-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-libs(x86-64) = 5.12.6-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both plasma-workspace-common-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-common-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install both plasma-workspace-common-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-common-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 - package sddm-breeze-5.13.3-3.fc28.noarch requires plasma-workspace = 5.13.3-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both plasma-workspace-libs-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-libs-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install both plasma-workspace-libs-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-libs-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 - package plasma-workspace-geolocation-libs-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.13.3-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.i686 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package plasma-workspace-libs-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package plasma-workspace-geolocation-libs-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.i686 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 Problem 9: package kde-print-manager-libs-17.12.3-1.fc28.x86_64 requires kde-print-manager = 17.12.3-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package kde-print-manager-17.12.3-1.fc28.i686 requires plasma-workspace, but none of the providers can be installed - package kde-print-manager-17.12.3-1.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.6-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.6-1.fc28.i686 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.6-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.4-1.fc28.i686 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.4-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.12.4-1.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.12.4-1.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both plasma-workspace-common-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-common-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install both plasma-workspace-common-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-common-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install both plasma-workspace-common-5.12.4-1.fc28.x86_64 and plasma-workspace-common-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 - package plasma-workspace-geolocation-libs-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-common = 5.13.3-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-geolocation-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasma-workspace-geolocation-libs(x86-64) = 5.13.3-3.fc28, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.i686 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - package plasma-workspace-5.13.3-3.fc28.x86_64 requires plasmashell >= 5.13, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package plasma-workspace-geolocation-5.12.6-1.fc28.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package kde-print-manager-libs-17.12.3-1.fc28.x86_64 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.i686 - nothing provides plasma-systemsettings >= 5.13 needed by plasma-desktop-5.13.3-2.fc28.x86_64 ======================================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================================================================================================================================== Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): libkworkspace5 x86_64 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 96 k plasma-workspace-common x86_64 5.12.4-1.fc28 fedora 45 k plasma-workspace-common x86_64 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 46 k plasma-workspace-libs x86_64 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 1.5 M Skipping packages with broken dependencies: kde-print-manager i686 17.12.3-1.fc28 fedora 377 k kde-print-manager i686 17.12.3-1.fc28 updates-testing 377 k plasma-desktop i686 5.13.3-2.fc28 updates-testing 6.1 M plasma-desktop x86_64 5.13.3-2.fc28 updates-testing 5.9 M plasma-integration x86_64 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 153 k plasma-lookandfeel-fedora noarch 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 11 M plasma-workspace i686 5.12.4-1.fc28 fedora 5.0 M plasma-workspace x86_64 5.12.4-1.fc28 fedora 4.9 M plasma-workspace i686 5.12.6-1.fc28 updates 5.0 M plasma-workspace i686 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 5.1 M plasma-workspace x86_64 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 5.0 M plasma-workspace-geolocation x86_64 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 82 k plasma-workspace-geolocation-libs x86_64 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 45 k sddm-breeze noarch 5.13.3-3.fc28 updates-testing 397 k Transaction Summary ======================================================================================================================================================================================== Skip 18 Packages Nothing to do.

9 months, 1 week

3
4
0 / 0

Are you able to mount your Android devices in the Dolphin?

by Sudhir Khanger

Hello, I get the following error when I try to mount my Google Pixel running Android P and another old Android device with an older version of Android. >The file or folder udi=/org/kde/solid/udev/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb2/2-2 does not exist. I wonder if you guys are able to get usb access to your Android devices. I have following mtp packages installed. esmtp-1.2-10.fc28.x86_64 kf5-ksmtp-17.12.3-1.fc28.x86_64 libesmtp-1.0.6-14.fc28.x86_64 kio_mtp-0.75-17.20141221gitc418634.fc28.x86_64 libmtp-1.1.14-3.fc28.x86_64 -- Regards, Sudhir Khanger, sudhirkhanger.com.

9 months, 1 week

10
27
0 / 0

Consider dropping qtlogging.ini *.debug=false override

by Rex Dieter

Currently, fedora packages provide /usr/share/qt5/qtloggin.ini that includes [Rules] *.debug=false qt.qpa.xcb.xcberror.warning=false Some users have recently commented in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227295 that we should consider dropping '*.debug=false' It appears a couple of distros (debian, ubuntu) have done so recently in reaction to user feedback, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=886437 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/+bug/1731646 I'm thinking it may be time for fedora to follow suit. Software has gotten better, kde.org stuff in particular, at supporting categorized logging (with sane defaults) since f22. Thoughts? -- Rex

9 months, 1 week

5
4
2 / 0

Elisa music player

by Syam Krishnan

Hi, Since there was a discussion about dropping Amarok from the KDE spin since it's still Qt4 based, I looked at alternatives and found Juk and Elisa. It seems that Elisa is more modern of the two. But I wasn't able to find a Fedora package. Any reasons for not packaging Elisa yet (other than the obvious - no takers yet)? Thanks, Syam

9 months, 1 week

6
5
0 / 0

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

kde July 2018