I currently use t-bird with an nntp account pointing to gmane to read
this list and sereral others. Does kde have an nntp client program of
any sort? I don't see it as a possible new account type in kmail. Also,
search with kpackagekit yields nothing with "usenet" or "nntp" that is
kde specific.
-gene
Hello Everyone,
I don't THINK I have seen this issue mentioned on this list or on the
FAQ's/Documentation that we are frequently pointed to. If I missed it, I do
apologize.
First, check out these screenshots:
http://www.afolkey2.net/~steve/NepomukStrigi-Metadata-Screenshot-001.pnghttp://www.afolkey2.net/~steve/NepomukStrigi-Metadata-Screenshot-002.png
You will notice that on NepomukStrigi-Metadata-Screenshot-001.png only the "Is
part of:" metadata is displayed.
In addition to that field, in the NepomukStrigi-Metadata-Screenshot-002.png
screenshot you will see the following:
"Album:"
"Average bitrate:"
"Channels:"
"Codec:"
"Comment:"
"Content created:"
"Performer:"
"Sample rate:"
"Title:"
"Track number:"
Any ideas on what may be causing this? Permissions and ownership are the same
on all files.
Steven P. Ulrick
Hello,
Fedora KDE packaging guidelines have evolved over time, but official
Fedora cmake guidelines [1] are still the same that were originally
accepted in 2007.
I would like to propose a few changes to the example cmake spec file to
bring it more in line with KDE spec files:
%build
-%cmake .
-make VERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags}
+mkdir -p %{_target_platform}
+pushd %{_target_platform}
+%{cmake} ..
+popd
+
+make %{?_smp_mflags} -C %{_target_platform}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT -C %{_target_platform}
%check
-ctest
+make test -C %{_target_platform}
A few packages [2] [3] have recently had problems with the default
-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON which is part of %cmake macro. Those
packages didn't pass neither SHARED nor STATIC arguments to
add_library() call and relied on the cmake usual default to produce
static libraries. Those static libraries weren't meant to be installed;
they were just used as "convenience" libraries during the build which
would be statically linked into the final executable.
However, if BUILD_SHARED_LIBS is defined, we get unversioned shared
libraries instead of "convenience" libraries. Packagers often don't know
what to do with such unversioned libraries.
Perhaps it'd be better to completely remove -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON
from the default %cmake macro? I would imagine that most (all?)
libraries which are meant to be actually used as shared libraries
contain explicit add_library(... SHARED) and set_target_properties(...
PROPERTIES VERSION ... SOVERSION ...) calls, but maybe that's not how it
is. Any thoughts whether removing BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON would break
existing packages?
Anything else in the guidelines which needs discussion?
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Cmake
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539948
[3] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-June/13771
--
Kalev
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2223537
[ 9%] Generating index.cache.bz2
cd /builddir/build/BUILD/kdesvn-1.5.3/doc/nl && /usr/bin/meinproc4 --check
--cache
/builddir/build/BUILD/kdesvn-1.5.3/i686-redhat-linux-gnu/doc/nl/index.cache.bz2 /builddir/build/BUILD/kdesvn-1.5.3/doc/nl/index.docbook
index.docbook:14: warning: failed to load external entity "dtd/kdex.dtd"
]>
^
Looks like kdex.dtd is gone from kdelibs 6:4.4.80-3.fc14.
On my F13 box:
# rpm -ql kdelibs | grep kdex.dtd
/usr/share/kde4/apps/ksgmltools2/customization/dtd/kdex.dtd
Anyone know where it has moved to or what replaces it?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
Hi All,
Does Network Manager plasmoid works in 4.5 RC-1 ?
I tried using it, but it was not showing any connection, though I created a
wired connection for my wired interface.
Thanks,
Anoop
Hi Guys....
I was wondering if anybody can provide some advice. I recently received an
email from bugzilla about a failure building knutclient against rawhide (aka
fc14).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599985
>From the info provided in buildlogs (the relevant section included below) it
would seem that there seems to be a general failure in the mock environment as
the only error message in the build log seems to be that mock failed.
The email I receive leads to a link:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS
which requests that I set a depends on the bug report that was sent to me.
However when I go searching for a bug for mock I'm confronted with agazillion
bugs. (hmmm???)
Do I need to pay attention to this? Is my assumption correct that this is a
general failure of the mock build system for rawhide? Any advice would be most
welcome.
Thanks
Eli
RPM build errors:
+ '%{__cmake}' -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=release -
DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=/usr -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON -
DDATA_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/share/kde4/apps -
DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/include/kde4 -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/lib -
DLIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/usr/libexec/kde4 -DSYSCONF_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=/etc ..
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ElnCeg: line 44: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ElnCeg (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ElnCeg (%build)
Child returncode was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/knutclient.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in
trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 333, in do
raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s"
% (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/knutclient.spec']
LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 26/2010
Time: 2010-06-29 14:00 UTC
Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-06-29
Meeting minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-06-29/kde-sig.2010-06-29-14.05.html
Meeting log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-06-29/kde-
sig.2010-06-29-14.05.log.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
+ guests
* adimania
* gwerra
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Agenda =
* topics to discuss:
o qt 4.6.3 update
o Release criteria for KDE
o FSC: KDE netbook spin
* recent bugs:
o https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498111 this isn't new
but my understanding is that the problem could be worked around by a change to
qt - the grass/gdal maintainer is awol (and it isn't clear that he could be
doing anything about the problem).
= Summary =
qt 4.6.3 update
* AGREED: to push qt 4.6.3 directly to stable as it's security update
o has been blocked by non-public status of security bugs
Release criteria for KDE
* QA has been asking us to look at the current release criteria
* Kevin_Kofler to bring Release Criteria to KDE mailing list [1]
FSC: KDE netbook spin
* adimania and gwerra are working on KDE Netbook Spin [2] [3]
* few questions raised
o owner: KDE SIG
o opinion for splits/removals of packages based on size
constraints/usability etc.
+ review from KDE SIG required
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Next Meeting =
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-07-06
= Links =
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KDE_Netbook_Spin
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Spins_KDE_Netbook_Spin
--
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik(a)redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/
I always seems to have to fiddle around with it just to be able to see
contact information. I've followed all the guide, all the services
that I don't use are running: Nepomunuku, Sringi, etc. and when I want
to see someone's telephone number, I double click on their name, and
get the blank dialog. I already followed the published info for
resolving this.
I can't be the only one using the KDE address book, yet I am not doing
anything special with it. So what should my next move be?
--
Fedora 13
(www.pembo13.com)