qt-4.5 (kde-unstable) segfaults in lupdate-qt4

[Neal Becker]

 lupdate-qt4[10058]: segfault at 100000000 ip 0000000000441237 sp 
00007fff765b0bc8 error 6 in lupdate-qt4[400000+81000]

Sorry, I had to revert to qt-4.4.3 so I can't give any more debug info.

[Rex Dieter]

Neal Becker wrote:

>   lupdate-qt4[10058]: segfault at 100000000 ip 0000000000441237 sp
>  00007fff765b0bc8 error 6 in lupdate-qt4[400000+81000] 
Yep, we know about that one.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486866

Reminds me... I'll have to check if it's been upstreamed yet or not.

-- Rex

[Neal Becker]

On Friday 13 March 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
>  Neal Becker wrote:
>  >  lupdate-qt4[10058]: segfault at 100000000 ip 0000000000441237 sp
>  > 00007fff765b0bc8 error 6 in lupdate-qt4[400000+81000]
>
>  Yep, we know about that one.
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486866
>
>  Reminds me... I'll have to check if it's been upstreamed yet or not.
>  
Since it's claimed to be fixed in 4.5.0-6.fc11, any plan to update F10?

[Rex Dieter]

Neal Becker wrote:
>  On Friday 13 March 2009, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Neal Becker wrote:
> >>  lupdate-qt4[10058]: segfault at 100000000 ip 0000000000441237 sp
> >> 00007fff765b0bc8 error 6 in lupdate-qt4[400000+81000]
> > Yep, we know about that one.
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486866
> >
> > Reminds me... I'll have to check if it's been upstreamed yet or not.
> >
>  
>  Since it's claimed to be fixed in 4.5.0-6.fc11, any plan to update F10? 
Sure, I can do an F=10 build.

-- Rex