KDE-SIG meeting report (19/2010)

[Jaroslav Reznik]

This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the 
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
 to this email or add it to the related meeting page.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

= Weekly KDE Summary =

Week: 19/2010

Time: 2010-05-11 14:00 UTC

Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-11

Meeting minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-
meeting/2010-05-11/kde-sig.2010-05-11-14.02.html 

Meeting log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-05-11/kde-
sig.2010-05-11-14.02.log.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

= Agenda =

    *  topics to discuss:
          o Default install paths for apidocs
          o Duplicate menu entries, e.g. #591089:
                + Do we consider these bugs?
                + Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where 
upstream has them?
                + If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? 
Or only in new releases?
                + Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks 
consider these release blockers. 
          o KDE SC 4.4.3 status 
    * recent bugs:
          o (none) 

= Summary =
KDE SC 4.4.3 status

    * kde-l10n needs respin and build
    * ACTION: ltinkl to respin and build kde-l10n and to prepare Bodhi update 

Duplicate menu entries

    * See [1], [2], [3]
          o Do we consider these bugs?
          o Or do we want to follow upstream and keep the dupes where upstream 
has them?
          o If we consider them bugs, do we want to fix these in updates? Or 
only in new releases?
          o Do we want these to be blockers for F14? The GNOME folks consider 
these release blockers. 
    * AGREED: on Kevin Kofler's proposal - report upstream, follow upstream's 
decision, don't treat it as a release blocker 

Default install paths for apidocs

    * we are inconsistent in apidocs directories naming and location
          o soprano contains version, some apidocs are installed in doc/lib-
apidocs/, some doc/HTML/en/lib-apidocs
          o we need consistent naming and common install location
                + AGREED: apidocs not to be installed to version specific 
directories
                + AGREED: on adapting to KDevelop needs, rdieter to check it 
    * final decision postponed to next meeting 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

= Next Meeting =

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Meetings/2010-05-18

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

= Links =
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591089
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591093
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591097

-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik(a)redhat.com&gt;
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

Office: [phone]
Mobile: [phone]
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com/