Am 04.03.2017 um 22:21 schrieb Luigi Toscano:
Reindl Harald ha scritto:
>
>
> Am 04.03.2017 um 21:50 schrieb Luigi Toscano:
>> Reindl Harald ha scritto:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 04.03.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Gerald B. Cox:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Reindl Harald
<h.reindl(a)thelounge.net
>>>> <mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> oh yeah instead maintain / replace a for many years known
>>>> application with a clear name introduce a new application with a
>>>> idiotic (because pointsless) name - we really live in a great decade
>>>>
>>>> Yeah Harald, that crossed my mind also - but my guess is that someone
>>>> else developed the "Spectacle" application and either
didn't like the
>>>> "KSnapshot" name or wasn't allowed to use it. Contrast
that with Google
>>>> who can't seem to settle for a name: e.g. Google Talk, Hangouts,
>>>> Messenger, Allo, Duo, Android Messages
>>>
>>> projects like KDE *really* should introduce rules that shitty application
>>> names which don't give anybody a clue about what the applications is
supposed
>>> to do are prohibited, especially when consider ot replace knowen and logical
>>> named ones
>>
>> You don't need to know the name of an application which pop ups when you
press
>> "Print"
guess what happens when you assigned a application by hand and switched
them for a shortcut - as long it does not provide the same binary name
it just don#t work any longer since that settiungs are in teh userhome
and no package has a business to touch user settings
guess what happens when you try to cleanup your system with "dnf leaves"
and every package has a *idiotic* name like "spectacle" - you either
remove it becaus eoyu don#t know what it is or you have to google for
every package what the stuff is supposed to do
for *** which needs to re-install their systems and userprofile regulary
that maybe don't matter - i prefer smarter setups and many of them are
running for nearly 10 years - do the math F9 to F25