Transifex

[Richard van der Luit]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


This is what i get if i want to go to the new
http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/nl :

- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bad Gateway

The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /languages/nl/.

Reason: Error reading from remote server
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Temporary or should i file a bugreport?

grtz
richard
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmUeX8ACgkQ3NhUwsVgVoYYywCghVmLMbzSmSD8b9RgVTdxE2sT
> wU0AnjjvPYY0Taan9bUb9fcE4yZHJZpW
> =Ki9h
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Dimitris Glezos]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:33 PM, R.E. van der Luit <zuma(a)xs4all.nl&gt; wrote:
>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>
>  This is what i get if i want to go to the new
>  http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/nl :
>
>  - ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Bad Gateway
>
>  The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
>  The proxy server could not handle the request GET /languages/nl/.
>
>  Reason: Error reading from remote server
>  - -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>  Temporary or should i file a bugreport? 
This is an Infrastructure problem of Damned Lies, not Transifex (why
didn't we deploy Tx at transifex.fedoraproject.org again? =)

I'd suggest asking in #fedora-admin and if no luck, opening a ticket
on the Fedora Infrastructure wiki.

Work is underway to upgrade DL to a more stable version.

-δ



-- 
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/

"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--

[Francesco Tombolini]

Dimitris Glezos ha scritto:
>  On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 9:33 PM, R.E. van der Luit
> <zuma(a)xs4all.nl&gt; wrote:
>    
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > This is what i get if i want to go to the new
> > http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/nl :
> >
> > - ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Bad Gateway
> >
> > The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
> > The proxy server could not handle the request GET /languages/nl/.
> >
> > Reason: Error reading from remote server
> > - -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Temporary or should i file a bugreport?
> >     
>
>  This is an Infrastructure problem of Damned Lies, not Transifex (why
>  didn't we deploy Tx at transifex.fedoraproject.org again? =)
>
>  I'd suggest asking in #fedora-admin and if no luck, opening a ticket
>  on the Fedora Infrastructure wiki.
>
>  Work is underway to upgrade DL to a more stable version.
>
>  -δ
>     
I hope that the upgrade will be more than a hope.
Yes, "all" the L10n project locked by a single web app.
Varie risorse Fedora       0% (0/0/5164)     
Fedora 11 (Leonidas)     14% (595/31/3622)    
Fedora 10 (Cambridge)     0% (0/0/3600)    
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5     0% (0/0/2411)
hundreds of fedora contributors continuosly afflicted by po or pot files
not updated or false stats, with no way of contribute in other manner.
Do we need an alternative?
Or do we wait that DL become stable?
Best regards

-- 
Francesco Tombolini <tombo(a)adamantio.net&gt; <tombo(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Key fingerprint = EDA9 7504 AA93 CEFC 5990  1356 8584 6B05 F140 5F73
http://www.adamantio.net

[Piotr Drąg]

Francesco Tombolini pisze:
>  I hope that the upgrade will be more than a hope.
>  Yes, "all" the L10n project locked by a single web app.
>  Varie risorse Fedora       0% (0/0/5164)     
>  Fedora 11 (Leonidas)     14% (595/31/3622)    
>  Fedora 10 (Cambridge)     0% (0/0/3600)    
>  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5     0% (0/0/2411)
>  hundreds of fedora contributors continuosly afflicted by po or pot files
>  not updated or false stats, with no way of contribute in other manner.
>  Do we need an alternative?
>  Or do we wait that DL become stable?
>   
This is most likely caused by recent outage [1], or someone manually 
deleted DL cache, and statistics are being rebuild now. It should be 
done months ago. Hopefully statistics will be correct after rebuild.

[1] 
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-February/msg000...

-- 
Piotr Drąg
http://raven.pmail.pl

[Francesco Tombolini]

Piotr Drąg ha scritto:
>  Francesco Tombolini pisze:
> > I hope that the upgrade will be more than a hope.
> > Yes, "all" the L10n project locked by a single web app.
> > Varie risorse Fedora       0% (0/0/5164)     Fedora 11 (Leonidas)    
> > 14% (595/31/3622)    Fedora 10 (Cambridge)     0% (0/0/3600)    Red
> > Hat Enterprise Linux 5     0% (0/0/2411)
> > hundreds of fedora contributors continuosly afflicted by po or pot files
> > not updated or false stats, with no way of contribute in other manner.
> > Do we need an alternative?
> > Or do we wait that DL become stable?
> >
>
>  This is most likely caused by recent outage [1], or someone manually
>  deleted DL cache, and statistics are being rebuild now. It should be
>  done months ago. Hopefully statistics will be correct after rebuild.
>
>  [1]
>  https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-February/msg000...
>
>  
You are very kind to answer that a recent DNS outage, can stop all
translation work.
But what it seems, is that this project may need a test environment 
with more deep and long testing period before deploy an upgrade or a new
app.
My point of view is that Fedora DL throw away all the benefit coming
from its association with Transifex, making the project, to be
continuosly at an apparently start phase.
Due to the lack of a locking system of the po file (like the old redhat
method), the crew waste their time translating already translated
strings, or filling the wiki or the mailing list of strange messages to
know, "who and when is work on what", constantly with the same doubt:
"Are the stats updated?", "I'm translating the right latest file or
not?"

-- 
Francesco Tombolini <tombo(a)adamantio.net&gt; <tombo(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
Key fingerprint = EDA9 7504 AA93 CEFC 5990  1356 8584 6B05 F140 5F73
http://www.adamantio.net

[Xavi Conde]

>  You are very kind to answer that a recent DNS outage, can stop all
>  translation work.
>  But what it seems, is that this project may need a test environment
>  with more deep and long testing period before deploy an upgrade or a new
>  app.
>  My point of view is that Fedora DL throw away all the benefit coming
>  from its association with Transifex, making the project, to be
>  continuosly at an apparently start phase.
>  Due to the lack of a locking system of the po file (like the old redhat
>  method), the crew waste their time translating already translated
>  strings, or filling the wiki or the mailing list of strange messages to
>  know, "who and when is work on what", constantly with the same doubt:
>  "Are the stats updated?", "I'm translating the right latest file or
> not?"
>  
+1.

-- 
"We the willing, following the unknowing are
doing the impossible. We have done so much
for so long with so little we are now able to do
anything with nothing."