Re: Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Hajime Taira]

Hi, Kevin

po file is ja.po in git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-web.git
Of Course. it already commited.

But it can not regenerate po file to html in fpo.

Taira

2010/11/27 TAIRA Hajime
> Hi, Kevin
>
> po file is ja.po in git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-web.git
> Of Course. it already commited.
>
> But it can not regenerate po file to html in fpo.
>
> Taira
>
> 2010/11/27 Kévin Raymond
>
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Hajime Taira
> > wrote:
> > > Hi, website team & translation team.
> > > Now, I translate fpo for Japanese. I uploaded from translate.fpo.
> > > A few week ago, It could apply to fpo about 3 hour.
> > > But it can not apply po file to fpo recently.
> > > What's happened?
> > > Taira
> >
> > Hi Taira,
> > Which po file is it?
> > Our Transifex is not stable any more. Work is in progress concerning
> > its migration to newer version.
> > Which is the error you get while trying to upload your po file?
> > By default, if you get a "file not found" error using transifex, try
> > to refresh the cache (button appear only while logged in).
> >
> > If you still can't upload your file, send it to me and I'll push it for
> > you.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > --
> > Kévin Raymond (shaiton)
> > GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Kévin Raymond]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Hajime Taira  wrote:
> Hi, Kevin
>
> po file is ja.po in git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-web.git
> Of Course. it already commited.
>
> But it can not regenerate po file to html in fpo.
>
> Taira
>
> 2010/11/27 TAIRA Hajime
> > Hi, Kevin
> >
> > po file is ja.po in git.fedorahosted.org/git/fedora-web.git
> > Of Course. it already commited.
> >
> > But it can not regenerate po file to html in fpo.
> >
> > Taira

Ok, I've seen it.
I could miss the point, but i think that
* website is rebuilt hourly on the master branch, concerning English only
* all websites are rebuilt daily for all languages

Therefor, your changes should appear only the following day. If the
changes does not appear tomorrow, then there is an issue in the infra
part. I've checked locally and the build was right.

--
Kévin Raymond (shaiton)
GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Sijis Aviles]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
> Ok, I've seen it.
> I could miss the point, but i think that
> website is rebuilt hourly on the master branch, concerning English only
> all websites are rebuilt daily for all languages

This isn't accurate.

The website is rebuilt hourly based on the master branch. The build includes
*all* languages, not just English. This means that the website is rebuild
hourly for all languages.
> Therefor, your changes should appear only the following day. If the
> changes does not appear tomorrow, then there is an issue in the infra
> part. I've checked locally and the build was right.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites

Based on the timing it was uploaded in transifex, the changes should be
visible, at most, within 2 hours.

Sijis

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Hajime Taira]

Hi, Sijis

Thank you.

I checked fpo website today.
ja.po file can not apply to fpo yet.

Taira

2010/11/28 Sijis Aviles
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
> > Ok, I've seen it.
> > I could miss the point, but i think that
> > website is rebuilt hourly on the master branch, concerning English only
> > all websites are rebuilt daily for all languages
>
> This isn't accurate.
>
> The website is rebuilt hourly based on the master branch. The build
> includes *all* languages, not just English. This means that the website is
> rebuild hourly for all languages.
> > Therefor, your changes should appear only the following day. If the
> > changes does not appear tomorrow, then there is an issue in the infra
> > part. I've checked locally and the build was right.
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
>
> Based on the timing it was uploaded in transifex, the changes should be
> visible, at most, within 2 hours.
>
> Sijis

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Sijis Aviles]

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Hajime Taira wrote:
> Hi, Sijis
>
> Thank you.
>
> I checked fpo website today.
> ja.po file can not apply to fpo yet.
>
> Taira

There was a stuck process on the server which wasn't allowing the website to
update properly. The updates should be visible now. You may have to clear
your browser cache or refresh the browser window to see the updates.

Sijis

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Thomas Canniot]

Le 28/11/2010 23:53, Sijis Aviles a écrit :
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Hajime Taira <[e-mail]
> > wrote:
> Hi, Sijis
>
> Thank you.
>
> I checked fpo website today.
> ja.po file can not apply to fpo yet.
>
> Taira
>
>
> There was a stuck process on the server which wasn't allowing the
> website to update properly. The updates should be visible now. You may
> have to clear your browser cache or refresh the browser window to see
> the updates.
>
> Sijis
>
> --
> trans mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

It seems it's still broken atm... :/

Thomas

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Kévin Raymond]

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Thomas Canniot
 wrote:
> It seems it's still broken atm... :/
>
> Thomas

To explain a bit more
Using fedorahosted[1] we can see that last commit was 11 days ago,
while on the master branch (commit log) it was 2 days ago.

Is there a wiki page where we can find name servers concerned by the
website (and which task they are doing)?
Sijis, I think that you where answering at this question last time
when my alias was down... I didn't get any answer ;-)

[1] http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=fedora-web.git;a=history;f=fedoraproject....

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Sijis Aviles]

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Thomas Canniot
>  wrote:
> > It seems it's still broken atm... :/
> >
> > Thomas
>
> To explain a bit more
> Using fedorahosted[1] we can see that last commit was 11 days ago,
> while on the master branch (commit log) it was 2 days ago.
>
> Is there a wiki page where we can find name servers concerned by the
> website (and which task they are doing)?
> Sijis, I think that you where answering at this question last time
> when my alias was down... I didn't get any answer ;-)
>
> [1]
> http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=fedora-web.git;a=history;f=fedoraproject....
>
> --
> Kévin Raymond (shaiton)
> GPG-Key: A5BCB3A2
> --
> trans mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/trans

There has been an infra issue [1] for a couple of days and it looks like it
was resolved today. Regardless of that, I was able to build the whole fp.o
locally without an issue and comparing my output with what's in fp.o they
appear identical to me.

If that's not the case, could you point to me exactly which string isn't
updating?

Thanks,

Sijis

[1] -
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/infrastructure/2010-December/009780...

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Sijis Aviles]

On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Kévin Raymond wrote:
> Is there a wiki page where we can find name servers concerned by the
> website (and which task they are doing)?
> Sijis, I think that you where answering at this question last time
> when my alias was down... I didn't get any answer ;-)

I thought i did answered you question. It took me to find it but its all
here [1].

You may not have access to the server but jumping onto #fedora-admin or
#fedora-websites, someone would have access there and double-check that
everything on those servers are acting properly.

Sijis

[1] -
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/2010-November/009061.html

Can not apply po file to fpo.

[Kévin Raymond]

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Sijis Aviles  wrote:
> I thought i did answered you question. It took me to find it but its all
> here [1].

Oh, I should have checked on the archives. Thanks!
> You may not have access to the server but jumping onto #fedora-admin or
> #fedora-websites, someone would have access there and double-check that
> everything on those servers are acting properly.

Yep, that was my intention

Ok, synchro works properly now.
Thanks